The New Yorker
September 12, 2015
By Adam Gopnik
Gopnik begins by summarizing the highlights of the dinner and quoting only a
few of Obama’s most provocative gibes, which serve to quickly refresh his
audience’s memory of what occurred four years ago, as well as form the context
of his analysis. Using figurative language, such as simile and
personification, he writes, “his head set in place, like a man in a pillory, he
barely moved or altered his expression as wave after wave of laughter struck
him” (Gopnik para. 3). Gopnik emphasizes the “parts” of the dinner to
introduce the cause he identifies: Trump’s humiliation and anxiety.
The author then relates such “parts” to the “whole,” his overall argument. To help his audience’s understanding, he defines the difference between the ideologies of a patriot and a populist nationalist, explaining that “it rests not on a sense of pride in place or background but in an intense sense of victimization (Gopnik para. 7). Gopnik argues that America feels victimized from a “double conspiracy of outsiders and elitists” (Gopnik para. 4), which is what both Trump and the American people have in common, and how Trump has been able to gain the incredible amount of support he has in the polls.
Gopnik bridges his evidence of Trump’s shame, America’s anxiety, and the basis of populist nationalism, ultimately synthesizing his argument about how Trump achieved his current success in the polls. In doing so, Gopnik appeals to the audience’s sense of logic and reason, successfully convincing readers of one possible reason for Trump’s peculiar political success.
No comments:
Post a Comment